Portfolio and risk analytics for digital assets.

Institutional methods, calibrated for how crypto actually behaves. Markets that never close, liquidity split across venues, books that gap, and correlations that collapse exactly when diversification should hold.

Pearlixa · analysis
book.csv · 6 positions · 18moAnalyze
Risk reportNAV $ 120M
VaR$ 23.4M99% · 10d
Stressed ES$ 41.0Mliquidity-adj.
CDaR41.8%95%
Deflated Sharpe0.71probability · PBO 0.19
Effective bets1.6of 6 positions

Your risk system covers everything. Except the part that moves.

Equities, fixed income, commodities, FX. Not crypto. So the most volatile position in the book is the one line nobody can decompose, stress or attribute, and what's available instead was built for retail.

Equities
covered
Fixed income
covered
Commodities
covered
FX
covered
Crypto

That's the layer we are.

Institutional analytics for the one asset class none of them cover. Descriptive only, so nothing about your edge changes hands.

Built for how crypto behaves. Not adapted from equities.

You still get factor decomposition, attribution, stress testing and tail diagnostics. The outputs are the same ones you already report. The machinery underneath them is different.

The equity method doesn't survive the move. Fundamental factor models earn their power from a large cross-section, and crypto's liquid universe is small and dense. Coverage isn't the same thing as capability.

In practice, tail risk is measured from the tail itself, not read off a curve fitted to the middle. Fragility is read from current conditions instead of inferred from the last drawdown. Stress signatures are matched against a library of crises, including ones that never happened, because the real record is too short to lean on alone.

BTC-USD68,412.30−2.4%My exposure
Regime
risk-off
14d
Tail index
3.1
EVT · heavy
Fragility
2 / 4
detectors firing
Funding
+0.021%
8h
Open interest
$11.8B
+8.4% 24h
Options skew
−4.2
25Δ · 30d
Forced liquidations$412M24h · long 71%
Closest crisis analogFeb 2018 vol shock0.66
Regime history90d

You chose one of these numbers.The other two chose themselves.

Six percent of NAV was a decision. A third of portfolio risk, and closer to half under the correlations crypto shows in a crisis, was not, and it appears in no report you currently receive. One column of your existing returns is enough to produce it, and nothing about your positions leaves your side.

6%
of capitalthe allocation you set
34%
of portfolio riskcurrent correlations
43%
of portfolio riskcrisis correlations
share of 10-day 99% VaR · $120M NAV · computed from one column of your returns

The papers you'd write yourself.Already written.

Reporting obligations do not come with an exemption for the asset class you cannot measure. The quarterly letter still goes out and the consultant still asks. Every other line in those packs has analytics behind it. The crypto line has a paragraph of prose.

Digital asset risk report

Prepared for the investment committee

PDFXLSXAPI
Exposure and concentration2
Risk contribution by sleeve and by asset5
Tail and drawdown anatomy9
Stress results against the crisis library14
Limit breaches and near misses19
What changed since the last period22
monthly or on demand

Everything through the API. Everything on the dashboard.

Nothing sits behind the API that the dashboard can't show, and nothing on the dashboard is a simplified read of something else. One engine behind dashboard, REST and webhook.

Now the tools exist for crypto. One column is enough.